Lommel United vs Liège Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Draw |
100%
|
- | |
| BTTS | BTTS No |
63.2%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Under 2.5 |
69%
|
- |
Lommel United
Liège
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Lommel United
0 matches
Liège
0 matches
| Lommel United | Statistic | Liège |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Wins | 0 |
| 0 | Draws | 0 |
| 0 | Losses | 0 |
| 0 | Goals For | 0 |
| 0 | Goals Against | 0 |
| 0 | Avg Goals Scored | 0 |
| 0 | Avg Goals Conceded | 0 |
| 0 | BTTS Yes | 0 |
| 0 | Over 1.5 | 0 |
| 0 | Over 2.5 | 0 |
| 0 | Over 3.5 | 0 |
| 0 | Clean Sheets | 0 |
| 0 | Failed To Score | 0 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
This tie brings together two sides with a fairly similar football identity, with the knockout context adding extra pressure to every phase of the game. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Because this is a knockout setting, momentum shifts, risk management, and late-game discipline could all carry more weight than in a standard league fixture. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. Taken together, the balance of indicators still supports Away Win, with the defensive lean favoring Liège. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Liège having the stronger overall control. There is little separation in the broader season picture, with both sides operating from relatively comparable league positions and points returns. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest.
Lommel United come into this tie placed - in their league with - points from - matches. The return of - wins, - draws, and - defeats, together with a -:- goal balance, points toward poor form . Their attacking influence is driven by their main attacking players, and at the back they have looked fairly stable. At home, they have managed - wins, - draws, and - losses, which supports an unclear split record. In tactical terms they still look like a side built around a balanced approach.
Liège enter this tie with a season profile built on - points from - matches, placing them - in their league. Their record of - wins, - draws, and - defeats with goals at -:- reflects poor form . Much of their attacking weight falls on D. Eckert Ayensa (5 goals), R. Said (5 goals), M. Ilaimaharitra (3 goals), with creative support from A. Abid (4 assists), R. Said (3 assists), T. Henry (2 assists), while defensively they have appeared fairly stable. Away from home, they have managed - wins, - draws, and - losses, which supports an unclear split record. In tactical terms they still look like a side built around a balanced approach.
Across those 8 head-to-head meetings, Lommel United won 3 times, Liège won 4 times, while 1 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 11:9 from Lommel United's perspective. 4 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 4 matches, with an average of 2.5 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | 28 | 4 | 8 | 91:45 | 46 | 57 |
W
D
W
W
W
|
|
| 2 | 40 | 25 | 11 | 4 | 66:27 | 39 | 53 |
W
D
L
W
L
|
|
| 3 | 40 | 22 | 5 | 13 | 61:46 | 15 | 43 |
W
L
D
L
W
|
|
| 4 | 40 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 59:62 | -3 | 33 |
L
W
D
D
L
|
|
| 5 | 40 | 13 | 12 | 15 | 53:57 | -4 | 29 |
W
L
D
D
D
|
|
| 6 | 40 | 13 | 12 | 15 | 48:61 | -13 | 29 |
L
D
D
L
W
|
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | 13 | 9 | 14 | 53:53 | 0 | 48 |
W
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 2 | 36 | 10 | 11 | 15 | 53:58 | -5 | 41 |
L
L
W
W
W
|
|
| 3 | 36 | 7 | 13 | 16 | 35:50 | -15 | 34 |
W
L
L
L
L
|
|
| 4 | 36 | 5 | 10 | 21 | 31:62 | -31 | 25 |
D
L
L
W
L
|
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | 19 | 9 | 2 | 50:17 | 33 | 66 |
W
D
L
W
L
|
|
| 2 | 30 | 20 | 3 | 7 | 59:36 | 23 | 63 |
W
D
W
W
W
|
|
| 3 | 30 | 18 | 3 | 9 | 47:35 | 12 | 57 |
W
L
D
L
W
|
|
| 4 | 30 | 13 | 6 | 11 | 49:43 | 6 | 45 |
W
L
D
D
D
|
|
| 5 | 30 | 12 | 9 | 9 | 39:37 | 2 | 45 |
L
D
D
L
W
|
|
| 6 | 30 | 12 | 8 | 10 | 43:39 | 4 | 44 |
L
W
D
D
L
|
|
| 7 | 30 | 11 | 9 | 10 | 46:47 | -1 | 42 |
L
W
D
D
W
|
|
| 8 | 30 | 11 | 7 | 12 | 27:35 | -8 | 40 |
L
W
D
W
W
|
|
| 9 | 30 | 10 | 9 | 11 | 36:40 | -4 | 39 |
L
L
W
L
D
|
|
| 10 | 30 | 9 | 8 | 13 | 31:32 | -1 | 35 |
W
D
L
L
L
|
|
| 11 | 30 | 9 | 7 | 14 | 38:42 | -4 | 34 |
W
D
L
W
W
|
|
| 12 | 30 | 9 | 7 | 14 | 32:43 | -11 | 34 |
L
D
W
L
D
|
|
| 13 | 30 | 8 | 8 | 14 | 38:47 | -9 | 32 |
W
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 14 | 30 | 7 | 10 | 13 | 39:47 | -8 | 31 |
L
L
W
W
W
|
|
| 15 | 30 | 6 | 13 | 11 | 30:37 | -7 | 31 |
W
L
L
L
L
|
|
| 16 | 30 | 3 | 10 | 17 | 24:51 | -27 | 19 |
D
L
L
W
L
|
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | 15 | 14 | 11 | 57:53 | 4 | 38 |
L
W
D
D
W
|
|
| 2 | 40 | 16 | 9 | 15 | 44:46 | -2 | 37 |
L
W
D
W
W
|
|
| 3 | 40 | 14 | 9 | 17 | 50:50 | 0 | 34 |
W
D
L
W
W
|
|
| 4 | 40 | 14 | 10 | 16 | 50:57 | -7 | 33 |
L
L
W
L
D
|
|
| 5 | 40 | 13 | 9 | 18 | 43:48 | -5 | 31 |
W
D
L
L
L
|
|
| 6 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 41:60 | -19 | 23 |
L
D
W
L
D
|