JIPPO vs PK-35 Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Away Win |
64.2%
|
2.49 | |
| BTTS | Yes |
62.8%
|
1.83 | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
64.5%
|
2.11 | |
| Corners O/U | Under 7.5 Corners |
92%
|
3.54 | |
| HT / FT | Draw / Away |
-
|
6.50 | |
| Correct Score | 1-2 |
-
|
10.00 |
JIPPO
PK-35
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
JIPPO
29 matches
PK-35
31 matches
| JIPPO | Statistic | PK-35 |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Wins | 16 |
| 9 | Draws | 8 |
| 7 | Losses | 7 |
| 37 | Goals For | 50 |
| 25 | Goals Against | 26 |
| 1.28 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.61 |
| 0.86 | Avg Goals Conceded | 0.84 |
| 13 | BTTS Yes | 12 |
| 19 | Over 1.5 | 21 |
| 10 | Over 2.5 | 15 |
| 5 | Over 3.5 | 7 |
| 10 | Clean Sheets | 14 |
| 9 | Failed To Score | 8 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
This match looks like a contest between two sides with a fairly similar football identity. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. Taken together, the balance of indicators still supports Away Win, with the defensive lean favoring PK-35. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward PK-35 having the stronger overall control. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day.
Operating from 4 place with 40 points from 23 games, JIPPO bring one of the stronger season profiles into this match. The return of 11 wins, 7 draws, and 5 defeats, together with goals at 32:20, reflects good form over their recent run. Much of their attacking edge comes through their main attacking players, while their defending has remained very solid. At home, their record of 5 wins, 4 draws, and 3 losses points to a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Their overall playing style can be described as balanced attacking football.
PK-35 come into this fixture from a strong position, holding 2 place with 48 points after 23 matches. They have recorded 14 wins, 6 draws, and 3 losses, with a 41:15 goal return and good form over their recent run. In attack they lean heavily on their main attacking players, while defensively they have looked very solid. Away from home, they have managed 9 wins, 1 draws, and 1 losses, which underlines a very strong split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. In stylistic terms they continue to show balanced attacking football.
Across those 15 head-to-head meetings, JIPPO won 4 times, PK-35 won 4 times, while 7 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 15:12 from JIPPO's perspective. 2 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 6 matches, with an average of 1.8 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | 18 | 4 | 3 | 45:22 | 23 | 58 |
D
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 2 |
PK-35
Away
|
25 | 14 | 7 | 4 | 41:18 | 23 | 49 |
D
L
W
D
W
|
| 3 | 25 | 13 | 5 | 7 | 47:29 | 18 | 44 |
L
W
D
L
L
|
|
| 4 |
JIPPO
Home
|
25 | 11 | 8 | 6 | 32:21 | 11 | 41 |
D
L
W
L
W
|
| 5 | 25 | 11 | 2 | 12 | 23:36 | -13 | 35 |
L
W
L
W
D
|
|
| 6 | 25 | 8 | 5 | 12 | 29:37 | -8 | 29 |
D
L
D
D
L
|
|
| 7 | 25 | 8 | 5 | 12 | 27:35 | -8 | 29 |
D
W
D
W
L
|
|
| 8 | 25 | 6 | 6 | 13 | 30:45 | -15 | 24 |
W
W
L
D
D
|
|
| 9 | 25 | 5 | 8 | 12 | 30:37 | -7 | 23 |
W
L
L
D
W
|
|
| 10 | 25 | 2 | 8 | 15 | 17:41 | -24 | 14 |
D
L
D
L
L
|