Predictions & Statistics
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Away or Draw |
71.1%
|
- | |
| BTTS | No |
65.8%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Under 2.5 |
72.8%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
84.1%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Draw / Away |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 0-1 |
-
|
- |
Banfield
River Plate
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Banfield
25 matches
River Plate
29 matches
| Banfield | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Wins | 14 |
| 6 | Draws | 4 |
| 11 | Losses | 11 |
| 28 | Goals For | 35 |
| 29 | Goals Against | 25 |
| 1.12 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.21 |
| 1.16 | Avg Goals Conceded | 0.86 |
| 12 | BTTS Yes | 9 |
| 17 | Over 1.5 | 16 |
| 11 | Over 2.5 | 8 |
| 4 | Over 3.5 | 6 |
| 7 | Clean Sheets | 12 |
| 8 | Failed To Score | 9 |
| 3.71 | Shots On Goal | 5.16 |
| 11.95 | Total Shots | 16 |
| 3.57 | Corners | 5.68 |
| 40.3% | Ball Possession | 65.1% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
On paper, this fixture places two sides in different competitive situations, shaped by River Plate's more proactive style and Banfield's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. River Plate carry the stronger overall league profile, standing 2 with 29 points while Banfield sit 12 on 18, suggesting a clearer edge in long-term output. The shape dynamic also adds another layer here, with Banfield expected to line up in 5-3-2 and River Plate in 4-2-3-1, which may reinforce the expected flow toward River Plate having the stronger overall control. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. River Plate arrive with more visible recent inconsistency, which may leave them vulnerable if the match starts badly. Across the main signals in this matchup, Away Win remains the stronger lean, and the clean-sheet angle slightly favors River Plate. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected.
So far, Banfield have built a campaign that leaves them 12 in the table on 18 points from 16 matches. Across the campaign, they have posted 5 wins, 3 draws, and 8 losses, while the 17:19 goal ratio supports the view of mixed form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on Tiziano Perrotta (3 goals), Bruno Sepúlveda (1 goals), Neyder Moreno (1 goals), with creative support from Ignacio Abraham (1 assists), Santiago López Garcia (1 assists), David Zalazar (1 assists), and defensively they have been very solid. At home, they have returned 4 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses, a split that suggests a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. In football terms, they tend to show a more cautious and defensive approach.
River Plate approach this match from a more delicate league position, standing 2 with 29 points from 16 matches. The overall return of 9 wins, 2 draws, and 5 defeats with a 22:12 goal balance points toward poor form with results showing a clear downward trend. Going forward they depend heavily on Facundo Colidio (4 goals), Gonzalo Montiel (2 goals), Sebastián Driussi (2 goals), with creative support from Facundo Colidio (2 assists), Juan Fernando Quintero (2 assists), Joaquín Freitas (2 assists), while defensively they have looked very solid. Away from home, they have managed 4 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses, a return that supports a fairly balanced split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. In football terms they often show balanced attacking football.
Across those 15 head-to-head meetings, Banfield won 3 times, River Plate won 9 times, while 3 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 16:27 from Banfield's perspective. 8 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 11 matches, with an average of 2.87 goals per game.
Banfield
Newells Old Boys
Banfield
Midland
Banfield
Racing Club
Banfield
Belgrano Cordoba
Banfield
Estudiantes de Rio Cuarto
Banfield
Sarmiento Junin
Banfield
Huracan
Banfield
San Martin Tucuman
Banfield
Barracas Central
Banfield
Atletico Tucuman
Banfield
Independ. Rivadavia
Banfield
Lanus
Banfield
Argentinos JRS
Banfield
Real Pilar
Banfield
Tigre
Banfield
Rosario Central
Banfield
Gimnasia L.P.
Banfield
Aldosivi
Banfield
River Plate
Banfield
Newells Old Boys
River Plate
Argentinos JRS
River Plate
Tigre
River Plate
Rosario Central
River Plate
Gimnasia L.P.
River Plate
Barracas Central
River Plate
Aldosivi
River Plate
Flamengo
River Plate
Belgrano Cordoba
River Plate
Rosario Central
River Plate
Gimnasia L.P.
River Plate
San Lorenzo
River Plate
Atletico Tucuman
River Plate
Aldosivi
River Plate
Boca Juniors
River Plate
Racing Club
River Plate
Belgrano Cordoba
River Plate
Estudiantes de Rio Cuarto
River Plate
Sarmiento Junin
River Plate
Huracan
River Plate
Independ. Rivadavia
Banfield
Midland
Banfield
Belgrano Cordoba
Banfield
Sarmiento Junin
Banfield
San Martin Tucuman
Banfield
Independ. Rivadavia
Banfield
Real Pilar
Banfield
Tigre
Banfield
Gimnasia L.P.
Banfield
Aldosivi
Banfield
Newells Old Boys
Banfield
Racing Club
Banfield
Estudiantes de Rio Cuarto
Banfield
Huracan
River Plate
Tigre
River Plate
Gimnasia L.P.
River Plate
Flamengo
River Plate
Racing Club
River Plate
Estudiantes de Rio Cuarto
River Plate
Huracan
River Plate
Independ. Rivadavia
River Plate
Velez Sarsfield
River Plate
Argentinos JRS
River Plate
Rosario Central
River Plate
Barracas Central
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 29:15 | 14 | 34 |
D
L
W
L
W
|
|
| 2 |
River Plate
Away
|
16 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 22:12 | 10 | 29 |
W
L
L
L
L
|
| 3 | 16 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 17:13 | 4 | 29 |
L
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 4 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 20:16 | 4 | 28 |
W
W
W
D
L
|
|
| 5 | 16 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 17:13 | 4 | 26 |
W
W
D
L
W
|
|
| 6 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 19:19 | 0 | 26 |
L
L
W
W
W
|
|
| 7 | 16 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 17:13 | 4 | 22 |
D
L
W
D
L
|
|
| 8 | 16 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 17:15 | 2 | 21 |
L
L
L
D
W
|
|
| 9 | 16 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 15:15 | 0 | 21 |
L
L
W
W
W
|
|
| 10 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 18:15 | 3 | 20 |
D
W
D
W
L
|
|
| 11 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 9 | 13:20 | -7 | 19 |
W
W
W
L
L
|
|
| 12 |
Banfield
Home
|
16 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 17:19 | -2 | 18 |
L
W
L
D
W
|
| 13 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 15:20 | -5 | 14 |
D
W
L
D
W
|
|
| 14 | 16 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 6:19 | -13 | 8 |
L
D
L
L
L
|
|
| 15 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 5:24 | -19 | 5 |
D
L
L
D
L
|