Vipers vs Entebbe UPPC Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
76.9%
|
- | |
| BTTS | BTTS Yes |
51.7%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Under 2.5 |
82.6%
|
- |
Vipers
Entebbe UPPC
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Vipers
23 matches
Entebbe UPPC
24 matches
| Vipers | Statistic | Entebbe UPPC |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Wins | 11 |
| 7 | Draws | 7 |
| 0 | Losses | 6 |
| 45 | Goals For | 21 |
| 12 | Goals Against | 16 |
| 1.96 | Avg Goals Scored | 0.88 |
| 0.52 | Avg Goals Conceded | 0.67 |
| 12 | BTTS Yes | 6 |
| 18 | Over 1.5 | 11 |
| 11 | Over 2.5 | 3 |
| 4 | Over 3.5 | 1 |
| 11 | Clean Sheets | 12 |
| 2 | Failed To Score | 10 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
From the opening view, this looks like a meeting between teams arriving with different levels of stability, reinforced by two sides with a fairly similar football identity. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Overall, the preferred tip is Away Win, while the clean-sheet lean points toward Entebbe UPPC. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. Vipers arrive from the stronger league position, sitting 1 with 55 points compared to Entebbe UPPC in 7 on 40, which underlines the gap in season consistency. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Entebbe UPPC having the stronger overall control.
Vipers approach this game with the confidence of a side sitting 1 on 55 points after 24 outings. The return of 16 wins, 7 draws, and 1 defeats, together with goals at 42:14, reflects good form over their recent run. Much of their attacking edge comes through K. Watambala (10 goals), A. Usama (8 goals), M. Karisa (6 goals), while their defending has remained very solid. At home, their record of 9 wins, 3 draws, and 0 losses points to a very strong split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. Their overall playing style can be described as balanced attacking football.
So far, Entebbe UPPC have built a campaign that leaves them 7 in the table on 40 points from 24 matches. Their overall return of 11 wins, 7 draws, and 6 losses with goals at 19:14 reflects poor form over their recent run. Their attacking weight is carried by A. Kigozi (10 goals), F. Tumwine (2 goals), I. Mubiru (2 goals), while defensively they have appeared very solid. Away from home, their split return of 5 wins, 5 draws, and 1 losses fits a very strong split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Stylistically, they usually display balanced attacking football.
Across those 2 head-to-head meetings, Vipers won 2 times, Entebbe UPPC won 0 times, while 0 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 4:0 from Vipers's perspective. 1 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 0 matches, with an average of 2 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Vipers
Home
|
30 | 19 | 10 | 1 | 55:17 | 38 | 67 |
W
W
D
D
D
|
| 2 | 30 | 19 | 5 | 6 | 46:22 | 24 | 62 |
W
D
W
W
D
|
|
| 3 | 30 | 18 | 7 | 5 | 47:17 | 30 | 61 |
W
W
W
D
L
|
|
| 4 | 30 | 16 | 8 | 6 | 43:22 | 21 | 56 |
D
D
L
L
W
|
|
| 5 |
Entebbe UPPC
Away
|
30 | 14 | 9 | 7 | 30:20 | 10 | 51 |
W
D
D
W
W
|
| 6 | 30 | 13 | 12 | 5 | 31:22 | 9 | 51 |
L
L
W
W
W
|
|
| 7 | 30 | 13 | 8 | 9 | 42:35 | 7 | 47 |
D
D
D
L
W
|
|
| 8 | 30 | 9 | 11 | 10 | 26:27 | -1 | 38 |
W
L
D
L
D
|
|
| 9 | 30 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 30:33 | -3 | 37 |
L
D
D
D
L
|
|
| 10 | 30 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 28:31 | -3 | 37 |
L
D
W
W
L
|
|
| 11 | 30 | 5 | 16 | 9 | 27:30 | -3 | 31 |
W
D
D
D
D
|
|
| 12 | 30 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 26:46 | -20 | 27 |
L
W
L
W
W
|
|
| 13 | 30 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 19:36 | -17 | 25 |
L
D
D
L
W
|
|
| 14 | 30 | 5 | 7 | 18 | 24:41 | -17 | 22 |
L
D
L
L
L
|
|
| 15 | 30 | 4 | 9 | 17 | 14:39 | -25 | 21 |
W
D
D
W
L
|
|
| 16 | 30 | 4 | 3 | 23 | 16:66 | -50 | 15 |
L
L
L
L
L
|