San Miguel vs Godoy Cruz Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Away or Draw |
70%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
62.8%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
64.5%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Draw / Away |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 1-2 |
-
|
- |
San Miguel
Godoy Cruz
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
San Miguel
28 matches
Godoy Cruz
28 matches
| San Miguel | Statistic | Godoy Cruz |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Wins | 12 |
| 11 | Draws | 7 |
| 11 | Losses | 9 |
| 21 | Goals For | 32 |
| 33 | Goals Against | 25 |
| 0.75 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.14 |
| 1.18 | Avg Goals Conceded | 0.89 |
| 11 | BTTS Yes | 12 |
| 19 | Over 1.5 | 17 |
| 9 | Over 2.5 | 11 |
| 2 | Over 3.5 | 4 |
| 9 | Clean Sheets | 9 |
| 12 | Failed To Score | 10 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
Looking at the broader profile of both teams, this encounter highlights Godoy Cruz's more proactive style and San Miguel's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. San Miguel have shown more instability in their recent run, so confidence and game management may become important factors. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. Taken together, the balance of indicators still supports Away Win, with the defensive lean favoring Godoy Cruz. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Godoy Cruz having the stronger overall control.
With 29 points from 26 games and a place of 12, San Miguel still have clear room for improvement in overall consistency. The overall return of 6 wins, 11 draws, and 9 defeats with a 20:28 goal balance points toward poor form with results showing a clear downward trend. Going forward they depend heavily on their main attacking players, while defensively they have looked fairly stable. At home, they have returned 5 wins, 4 draws, and 4 losses, which indicates a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they tend to play with a more cautious and defensive approach.
So far, Godoy Cruz have built a campaign that leaves them 6 in the table on 40 points from 26 matches. Across the campaign, they have posted 11 wins, 7 draws, and 8 losses, while the 29:24 goal ratio supports the view of good form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on their main attacking players, and defensively they have been very solid. Away from home, the record of 3 wins, 3 draws, and 7 losses points toward a weak split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Their broader style still suggests balanced attacking football.
Across those 1 head-to-head meetings, San Miguel won 0 times, Godoy Cruz won 0 times, while 1 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 0:0 from San Miguel's perspective. 0 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 0 matches, with an average of 0 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | 18 | 7 | 7 | 36:27 | 9 | 61 |
L
W
W
D
D
|
|
| 2 | 32 | 17 | 7 | 8 | 51:32 | 19 | 58 |
W
L
L
W
W
|
|
| 3 |
Godoy Cruz
Away
|
32 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 42:29 | 13 | 56 |
W
D
W
W
W
|
| 4 | 32 | 14 | 11 | 7 | 46:28 | 18 | 53 |
W
D
W
L
W
|
|
| 5 | 32 | 14 | 10 | 8 | 39:25 | 14 | 52 |
W
D
W
L
L
|
|
| 6 | 32 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 25:21 | 4 | 46 |
L
L
L
D
D
|
|
| 7 | 32 | 12 | 9 | 11 | 29:27 | 2 | 45 |
L
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 8 | 32 | 11 | 12 | 9 | 27:28 | -1 | 45 |
W
W
L
D
L
|
|
| 9 | 32 | 9 | 13 | 10 | 25:23 | 2 | 40 |
L
W
L
D
D
|
|
| 10 | 32 | 9 | 10 | 13 | 30:33 | -3 | 37 |
D
L
W
D
W
|
|
| 11 | 32 | 8 | 13 | 11 | 25:29 | -4 | 37 |
D
L
W
W
D
|
|
| 12 | 32 | 9 | 10 | 13 | 28:36 | -8 | 37 |
W
W
L
W
D
|
|
| 13 | 32 | 9 | 10 | 13 | 29:39 | -10 | 37 |
D
D
L
L
L
|
|
| 14 | 32 | 7 | 14 | 11 | 29:39 | -10 | 35 |
W
L
L
D
D
|
|
| 15 | 32 | 6 | 15 | 11 | 20:29 | -9 | 33 |
D
D
L
D
D
|
|
| 16 | 32 | 6 | 15 | 11 | 18:28 | -10 | 33 |
L
D
D
L
W
|
|
| 17 |
San Miguel
Home
|
32 | 6 | 13 | 13 | 25:38 | -13 | 31 |
L
L
D
D
L
|
| 18 | 32 | 7 | 8 | 17 | 22:35 | -13 | 29 |
L
W
W
L
L
|