MCF vs Fortune Sacco Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | No Draw |
92.1%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
62.8%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
64.5%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
MCF
Fortune Sacco
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
MCF
35 matches
Fortune Sacco
37 matches
| MCF | Statistic | Fortune Sacco |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Wins | 17 |
| 10 | Draws | 9 |
| 17 | Losses | 11 |
| 22 | Goals For | 58 |
| 37 | Goals Against | 41 |
| 0.63 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.57 |
| 1.06 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.11 |
| 11 | BTTS Yes | 18 |
| 17 | Over 1.5 | 22 |
| 11 | Over 2.5 | 17 |
| 3 | Over 3.5 | 12 |
| 13 | Clean Sheets | 15 |
| 18 | Failed To Score | 7 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
From the opening view, this looks like a meeting between teams arriving with different levels of stability, reinforced by Fortune Sacco's more proactive style and MCF's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Taken together, the balance of indicators still supports Away Win, with the defensive lean favoring Fortune Sacco. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. A relatively balanced game with moderate goal potential looks most likely. Fortune Sacco carry the stronger overall league profile, standing 7 with 60 points while MCF sit 18 on 34, suggesting a clearer edge in long-term output. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Fortune Sacco having the stronger overall control.
MCF approach this match from a more delicate league position, standing 18 with 34 points from 37 matches. Their record of 9 wins, 10 draws, and 18 losses, together with goals at 24:39, reflects poor form . Much of their threat comes through their main attacking players, while the defensive numbers suggest they have been fairly stable. At home, they have managed 7 wins, 4 draws, and 7 losses, a return that supports a fairly balanced split record. They are under visible pressure near the relegation zone. In football terms they often show a more cautious and defensive approach.
So far, Fortune Sacco have built a campaign that leaves them 7 in the table on 60 points from 37 matches. Across the campaign, they have posted 17 wins, 9 draws, and 11 losses, while the 58:41 goal ratio supports the view of poor form . Going forward they rely heavily on their main attacking players, and defensively they have been quite vulnerable. Away from home, they have returned 6 wins, 4 draws, and 8 losses, a split that suggests a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. In football terms, they tend to show balanced attacking football.
Across those 6 head-to-head meetings, MCF won 1 times, Fortune Sacco won 3 times, while 2 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 5:8 from MCF's perspective. 3 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 2 matches, with an average of 2.17 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | 25 | 6 | 7 | 57:29 | 28 | 81 |
D
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 2 | 38 | 23 | 8 | 7 | 62:26 | 36 | 77 |
D
W
W
D
D
|
|
| 3 | 38 | 24 | 4 | 10 | 51:32 | 19 | 76 |
D
W
L
D
W
|
|
| 4 | 38 | 21 | 11 | 6 | 56:28 | 28 | 74 |
W
L
W
W
D
|
|
| 5 | 38 | 16 | 16 | 6 | 51:30 | 21 | 64 |
D
D
D
D
L
|
|
| 6 |
Fortune Sacco
Away
|
38 | 18 | 9 | 11 | 61:41 | 20 | 63 |
W
W
L
L
L
|
| 7 | 38 | 17 | 10 | 11 | 47:30 | 17 | 61 |
D
L
W
W
W
|
|
| 8 | 38 | 16 | 9 | 13 | 53:41 | 12 | 57 |
L
W
L
W
W
|
|
| 9 | 38 | 15 | 8 | 15 | 32:33 | -1 | 53 |
L
L
D
D
L
|
|
| 10 | 38 | 14 | 10 | 14 | 31:27 | 4 | 52 |
W
D
L
D
W
|
|
| 11 | 38 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 37:36 | 1 | 50 |
W
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 12 | 38 | 12 | 8 | 18 | 35:41 | -6 | 44 |
W
L
W
L
W
|
|
| 13 | 38 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 30:51 | -21 | 43 |
L
D
W
L
L
|
|
| 14 | 38 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 32:52 | -20 | 39 |
D
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 15 | 38 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 23:47 | -24 | 39 |
W
L
L
D
W
|
|
| 16 | 38 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 32:44 | -12 | 39 |
L
L
L
D
D
|
|
| 17 | 38 | 10 | 8 | 20 | 27:48 | -21 | 38 |
W
W
L
D
W
|
|
| 18 |
MCF
Home
|
38 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 24:42 | -18 | 34 |
L
W
W
L
D
|
| 19 | 38 | 9 | 9 | 20 | 29:55 | -26 | 30 |
L
D
L
W
L
|
|
| 20 | 38 | 6 | 7 | 25 | 27:64 | -37 | 25 |
L
L
L
L
L
|
