Login Register
FINLAND › YKKöNEN
12.10.2026 15:30
Veritas Stadion

Inter Turku II vs FC jazz Prediction & Match Analysis

Full analysis and predictions for all markets

1X2
Away Win
Probability 71.5%
Odds -
BTTS
Yes
Probability 62.8%
Odds -
Over / Under 2.5
Over 2.5
Probability 66.7%
Odds -
All Markets
Market Option Probability Odds Stats & Analysis
1X2 Away Win
71.5%
- ▥
BTTS Yes
62.8%
- ▥
Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5
66.7%
- ▥
Corners O/U Over 7.5 Corners
87.7%
- ▥
HT / FT Draw / Away
-
- ▥
Correct Score 1-2
-
- ▥
Probability Distribution
Inter Turku II Win 24%
Draw 4.5%
FC jazz Win 71.5%
Expected Goals (xG)
Inter Turku II1.48
FC jazz1.76
Recent Form (Last 5)
Inter Turku II Inter Turku II
WWDLW
43 GF / 60 GA
FC jazz FC jazz
WLDWL
39 GF / 36 GA
Key Stats
1.54
Average Goals Scored
1.5
2.14
Average Goals Conceded
1.38
19
BTTS Yes
15
17
Over 2.5
14
0
Shots on Goal
0

Statistics are based on season averages

Season Statistics

Team averages and season trends before this fixture

Inter Turku II Inter Turku II 28 matches
FC jazz FC jazz 26 matches
Inter Turku II Statistic FC jazz
7 Wins 11
6 Draws 6
15 Losses 9
43 Goals For 39
60 Goals Against 36
1.54 Avg Goals Scored 1.5
2.14 Avg Goals Conceded 1.38
19 BTTS Yes 15
24 Over 1.5 24
17 Over 2.5 14
12 Over 3.5 8
4 Clean Sheets 6
6 Failed To Score 5
0 Shots On Goal 0
0 Total Shots 0
0 Corners 0
0% Ball Possession 0%

Match Analysis

Model notes, team context and key prediction signals

Final Verdict

From the opening view, this looks like a meeting between teams arriving with different levels of stability, reinforced by FC jazz's more proactive style and Inter Turku II's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward FC jazz having the stronger overall control. Across the main signals in this matchup, Away Win remains the stronger lean, and the clean-sheet angle slightly favors FC jazz. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. A relatively balanced game with moderate goal potential looks most likely. FC jazz carry the stronger overall league profile, standing 6 with 39 points while Inter Turku II sit 10 on 23, suggesting a clearer edge in long-term output. Inter Turku II have shown more instability in their recent run, so confidence and game management may become important factors.

Inter Turku II Analysis

Inter Turku II sit 10 with 23 points after 24 matches and remain under pressure to produce steadier results. The overall return of 6 wins, 5 draws, and 13 defeats with a 36:53 goal balance points toward poor form with results showing a clear downward trend. Going forward they depend heavily on their main attacking players, while defensively they have looked quite vulnerable. At home, they have returned 3 wins, 3 draws, and 6 losses, which indicates a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they tend to play with a more cautious and defensive approach.

FC jazz Analysis

From their first 25 matches, FC jazz have collected 39 points and now occupy 6 place in the table. Across the campaign, they have posted 11 wins, 6 draws, and 8 losses, while the 38:32 goal ratio supports the view of good form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on their main attacking players, and defensively they have been fairly stable. Away from home, the record of 7 wins, 3 draws, and 2 losses points toward a very strong split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Their broader style still suggests balanced attacking football.

1X2: Away Win
BTTS: Yes
Over/Under 2.5: Over 2.5
Highest model probability: 12 (95.5%)

Standings

Group Stage
# Team MP W D L G GD PTS Form
1 25 15 5 5 58:26 32 50
W L W L W
2 25 12 8 5 52:37 15 44
W L D W L
3 25 12 6 7 52:45 7 42
L W W W W
4 25 11 8 6 50:37 13 41
W W D W L
5 25 10 10 5 44:32 12 40
W W W L D
6 25 11 6 8 38:32 6 39
W L W W D
7 25 10 8 7 45:37 8 38
L W L W D
8 25 8 7 10 55:53 2 31
L L L W D
9 25 7 6 12 35:48 -13 27
L L W L W
10 25 7 5 13 39:53 -14 26
W W L L L
11 25 5 3 17 27:75 -48 18
L W L L L
12 25 3 6 16 41:61 -20 15
L L L L W