Predictions & Statistics
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
58.2%
|
- | |
| BTTS | BTTS Yes |
75.6%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
79.7%
|
- |
Ham-Kam
KFUM Oslo
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Ham-Kam
10 matches
KFUM Oslo
10 matches
| Ham-Kam | Statistic | KFUM Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Wins | 2 |
| 1 | Draws | 4 |
| 5 | Losses | 4 |
| 17 | Goals For | 14 |
| 18 | Goals Against | 18 |
| 1.7 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.4 |
| 1.8 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.8 |
| 6 | BTTS Yes | 7 |
| 9 | Over 1.5 | 9 |
| 7 | Over 2.5 | 5 |
| 5 | Over 3.5 | 3 |
| 3 | Clean Sheets | 2 |
| 1 | Failed To Score | 1 |
| 4 | Shots On Goal | 5.5 |
| 11.33 | Total Shots | 13.5 |
| 6.33 | Corners | 5.25 |
| 41.7% | Ball Possession | 56.5% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
Looking at the broader profile of both teams, this encounter highlights Ham-Kam's more proactive style and KFUM Oslo's more cautious structure. KFUM Oslo seem to carry the heavier availability burden, which may reduce some of their stability compared to the home side. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. The shape dynamic also adds another layer here, with Ham-Kam expected to line up in 5-3-2 and KFUM Oslo in 3-4-3, which may reinforce the expected flow toward KFUM Oslo having the stronger overall control. Taken together, the balance of indicators still supports Away Win, with the defensive lean favoring KFUM Oslo. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent.
With 3 points from 3 games and a place of 14, Ham-Kam still have clear room for improvement in overall consistency. The overall return of 1 wins, 0 draws, and 2 defeats with a 2:1 goal balance points toward poor form over their recent run. Going forward they depend heavily on H. Udahl (2 goals), Fredrik Sjolstad (1 goals), L. Mettler (1 goals), with creative support from H. Opsahl (1 assists), V. Jonsson (1 assists), while defensively they have looked very solid. At home, they have managed 1 wins, 0 draws, and 0 losses, a return that supports a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. In football terms they often show balanced attacking football. They are not at full strength, with L. Mares unavailable, although the overall attacking core still looks largely intact.
KFUM Oslo are currently 9 in the standings with 4 points from 4 matches. The record of 1 wins, 1 draws, and 2 defeats, together with a 3:3 goal balance, points toward poor form over their recent run. Much of their attacking threat comes through T. Haltvik (3 goals), Hakon Helland Hoseth (1 goals), Rasmus Eggen Vinge (1 goals), with creative support from J. Hjorth (2 assists), M. Vinjor (2 assists), T. Haltvik (1 assists), while at the back they have looked very solid. Away from home, their split return of 0 wins, 0 draws, and 1 losses fits a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they usually display a more cautious and defensive approach. They are not at full strength, with A. Aleesami, D. Hickson, B. Njie unavailable, although the overall attacking core still looks largely intact.
Across those 14 head-to-head meetings, Ham-Kam won 4 times, KFUM Oslo won 3 times, while 7 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 24:23 from Ham-Kam's perspective. 8 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 7 matches, with an average of 3.36 goals per game.
Ham-Kam
6
2
6
4
1
6
Lineups
Ham-Kam
Fredrikstad
Ham-Kam
Aalesund
Ham-Kam
Lillestrom
Ham-Kam
Fredrikstad
Ham-Kam
Valerenga
Ham-Kam
Kristiansund BK
Ham-Kam
Start
Ham-Kam
Molde
Ham-Kam
Brann
Ham-Kam
Sarpsborg 08 FF
Ham-Kam
Viking
Ham-Kam
Lyn
Ham-Kam
Haugesund
Ham-Kam
Kristiansund BK
Ham-Kam
Sarpsborg 08 FF
Ham-Kam
Kongsvinger
Ham-Kam
Lillestrom
KFUM Oslo
Molde
KFUM Oslo
Tromso
KFUM Oslo
Rosenborg
KFUM Oslo
Brann
KFUM Oslo
Viking
KFUM Oslo
Valerenga
KFUM Oslo
Sarpsborg 08 FF
KFUM Oslo
Aalesund
KFUM Oslo
Sandefjord
KFUM Oslo
Fredrikstad
KFUM Oslo
Start
KFUM Oslo
Stromsgodset
KFUM Oslo
Valerenga
KFUM Oslo
Fredrikstad
KFUM Oslo
Kongsvinger
KFUM Oslo
Lillestrom
KFUM Oslo
Skeid
Ham-Kam
Lillestrom
Ham-Kam
Valerenga
Ham-Kam
Start
Ham-Kam
Brann
Ham-Kam
Viking
Ham-Kam
Lyn
Ham-Kam
Kongsvinger
KFUM Oslo
Molde
KFUM Oslo
Brann
KFUM Oslo
Valerenga
KFUM Oslo
Aalesund
KFUM Oslo
Fredrikstad
KFUM Oslo
Valerenga
KFUM Oslo
Fredrikstad
KFUM Oslo
Lillestrom
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 29:10 | 19 | 27 |
W
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 2 | 13 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 18:14 | 4 | 25 |
D
D
L
W
D
|
|
| 3 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 28:11 | 17 | 23 |
D
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 4 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 17:11 | 6 | 19 |
L
L
W
L
W
|
|
| 5 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 18:13 | 5 | 19 |
W
L
W
L
W
|
|
| 6 |
Ham-Kam
Home
|
10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17:16 | 1 | 17 |
D
W
L
W
D
|
| 7 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 13:16 | -3 | 14 |
W
W
L
W
L
|
|
| 8 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 10:13 | -3 | 14 |
L
D
L
W
W
|
|
| 9 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 13:17 | -4 | 14 |
W
L
W
L
D
|
|
| 10 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 15:20 | -5 | 14 |
W
D
W
L
L
|
|
| 11 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 24:20 | 4 | 13 |
L
L
L
W
W
|
|
| 12 |
KFUM Oslo
Away
|
11 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 12:17 | -5 | 12 |
D
W
L
L
D
|
| 13 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 15:20 | -5 | 11 |
D
D
W
W
L
|
|
| 14 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 11:18 | -7 | 11 |
L
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 15 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9:18 | -9 | 9 |
D
L
L
W
L
|
|
| 16 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 13:28 | -15 | 7 |
L
W
L
L
D
|