Cardiff MET vs Flint Town United Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Away Win |
62.3%
|
- | |
| BTTS | BTTS Yes |
86%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
68.4%
|
- |
Cardiff MET
Flint Town United
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Cardiff MET
31 matches
Flint Town United
31 matches
| Cardiff MET | Statistic | Flint Town United |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Wins | 8 |
| 13 | Draws | 10 |
| 10 | Losses | 13 |
| 41 | Goals For | 46 |
| 49 | Goals Against | 57 |
| 1.32 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.48 |
| 1.58 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.84 |
| 21 | BTTS Yes | 18 |
| 27 | Over 1.5 | 25 |
| 17 | Over 2.5 | 19 |
| 12 | Over 3.5 | 15 |
| 4 | Clean Sheets | 7 |
| 8 | Failed To Score | 10 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
Looking at the broader profile of both teams, this encounter highlights two sides with a fairly similar football identity. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Overall, the preferred tip is Away Win, while the clean-sheet lean points toward Flint Town United. A relatively balanced game with moderate goal potential looks most likely. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. Cardiff MET have shown more instability in their recent run, so confidence and game management may become important factors. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Flint Town United having the stronger overall control. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent.
With 28 points from 22 games and a place of 7, Cardiff MET still have clear room for improvement in overall consistency. The overall return of 6 wins, 10 draws, and 6 defeats with a 33:36 goal balance points toward mixed form over their recent run. Going forward they depend heavily on L. Mwandwe (8 goals), J. Payne (7 goals), A. Roscrow (6 goals), with creative support from L. Rees (1 assists), while defensively they have looked fairly stable. At home, they have returned 3 wins, 4 draws, and 4 losses, which indicates a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Stylistically, they tend to play with a more cautious and defensive approach.
Flint Town United sit 11 with 21 points after 22 league matches. Across the campaign, they have posted 5 wins, 6 draws, and 11 losses, while the 34:48 goal ratio supports the view of poor form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on E. Reeves (11 goals), D. Stephenson (7 goals), B. Wynne (6 goals), and defensively they have been quite vulnerable. Away from home, the record of 2 wins, 4 draws, and 5 losses points toward a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Their broader style still suggests a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 14 head-to-head meetings, Cardiff MET won 7 times, Flint Town United won 3 times, while 4 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 23:21 from Cardiff MET's perspective. 8 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 10 matches, with an average of 3.14 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | 14 | 6 | 12 | 48:43 | 5 | 48 |
L
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 2 | 32 | 12 | 9 | 11 | 46:47 | -1 | 45 |
W
W
L
D
W
|
|
| 3 |
Cardiff MET
Home
|
32 | 8 | 14 | 10 | 43:51 | -8 | 38 |
D
L
W
W
L
|
| 4 |
Flint Town United
Away
|
32 | 8 | 11 | 13 | 48:59 | -11 | 35 |
D
L
L
D
D
|
| 5 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 33:45 | -12 | 32 |
L
W
L
W
D
|
|
| 6 | 32 | 3 | 4 | 25 | 17:82 | -65 | 13 |
L
L
W
L
L
|